Honda Pilot - Honda Pilot Forums banner

Honda 4WD vs. Subaru AWD

35K views 32 replies 21 participants last post by  cwa107  
#1 · (Edited)
I'm comparing a 2004 Subaru Forester XT (auto) to a 2003-04 Honda Pilot EX (4WD). I'm curious what the differences are in terms of what one can do and the other can't (i.e. light off-roading, traction control comparison, severe weather conditions, etc.).

Apparently the Honda Pilot has traction control but that seems to be the case only because it's FWD until the car senses wheel slippage and then sends power to the rear wheels. It's supposedly capable of transferring torque from 100:0 to 30:70 front to rear I guess? I'm considering the Honda Pilot since it has traction control while the Subaru Forester doesn't have traction control (for those model years).

Has anyone ever gone over this comparison before? I'm kind of curious because the Honda Pilot is a bit bigger than the Forester but I'm not so sure that added cargo capacity is worth it in terms of getting from point A to point.

I've been reading around on multiple forums and some people have quoted around a $3000 ballpark (give or take depending on where it's done) price range for replacing the transmission on a 2003-04 Honda Pilot. That a lot more expensive than replacing a head gasket on a 2004 Subaru Forester.

I've started a similar thread on a Subaru Forester forum. Use that as a reference or starting point if you'd like. Honda VTM-4 vs. Subaru AWD - Subaru Forester Owners Forum

One reason why I'm considering a Honda Pilot is because of the lock option for the VTM-4. If I was in a situation as seen in the video below, how would the Honda Pilot perform and would VTM-4 Lock really help in this situation? Would I have the same experience in the Honda Pilot as I would in a Subaru Forester found in this situation?


Oh, and another question. Since the Honda Pilot is FWD until it detects wheel slippage, does that mean when you're making a tight turn, the wheels won't bind up like on a regular 4x4? Or will there be some minor wheel binding like in the Subaru Forester's case (since the Subaru Forester is AWD with a torque split of 90:10 in drive)?
 
#2 ·
the pilot tranny/VTM would be blowing smoke already in that situation.
 
#4 ·
I'm by no means the authority on off-road prowess as it pertains to either system even though I own both. But I will tell you that my wife's Legacy (which I believe uses the same system) seems to be more reactive than the Pilot. That is, I can't feel the back end kick in until the front wheels are slipping (for example, in a situation where you're pulling out from a dead stop on a wet road).

The Pilot transfers torque every time you accelerate from a stop. So, you have varying degrees of torque at all four wheels accelerating from a stop. The VTM-4 lock, does a 50:50 fixed lock until 17mph (if I remember correctly) and has the potential to bind in turns, which is why Honda only allows its use in low gears and at low speeds.

Otherwise the system is seamless, you just step on the gas and it goes. I've owned two Pilots now (and '05 and now a '10) and have yet to find a need to use the lock.

A thorough description of the mechanics is described here:

Honda/Acura VTM-4
 
#11 ·
I'm by no means the authority on off-road prowess as it pertains to either system even though I own both. But I will tell you that my wife's Legacy (which I believe uses the same system) seems to be more reactive than the Pilot. That is, I can't feel the back end kick in until the front wheels are slipping (for example, in a situation where you're pulling out from a dead stop on a wet road).
The Subaru Forester found in the video I posted has a different, older AWD system compared to the newer Subarus. For 2009, all Subaru cars had VDC standard on the base trims. If I recall correctly, your wife's Legacy would have an easier time getting out of the ditch from the video compared to older Subarus which do not have traction control. In the video, you can see that this Forester's rear wheels were the ones who needed to be doing the work and not the front. The regular torque spit for those Forester model years is 90:10 until you put into 2nd or 1st. Then apparently the torque split becomes 50:50 but the Forester in the video appears to be a manual. But whatever, that's not the point.

the pilot tranny/VTM would be blowing smoke already in that situation.
That's a bad thing, right? It's kind of ironic since the manual says to not spin the wheels too much but that the 4WD system reacts to wheel spin.:31:
 
#5 ·
though I like the pilot part-time FWD to AWD system, it has its limitations. it will take you in any driving condition but doesn't have the off-road prowess of some "real" full time (symmetrical) or selectable 4WD system. in flat snowy road, it may be seemless but in an incline, icy(not ice!) condition, the front wheels will slide first before it engages the rear(auto) unless you have predicted ahead of time that it will slide and press the VTM button. but it is not a sustained locked 4WD system. just rheostat magnets to engage the rear continuously not for longer periods of time you are trying to get out of the ditch(hence the warning: spinning will break the VTM system).
 
#6 ·
Subaru has a viscous coupling. Range Rovers had that system too for years but suffered failures after 100k.

In Subies they can last until 150k by which time the tranny is probably also shot..... So take the cost of a tranny, add an $800 VC......
 
#10 ·
maintenance is key. "nervous" honda has VTM4 fluid every 14k miles and tranny fluid every 40k miles. if not followed, you have tranny failures at 80k miles. other manufacturers have it already at 100k mile interval maintenance.:31:
 
#12 ·
The Subaru system is a superior all wheel drive system. However, we love the VTM-4 in the Pilot. Its seamless transitioning from 2-4 wheel drive. You can't hear or feel when it engages. It just works. However, its not for serious off-roading, and was never meant to be.

As far as the Pilot tranny and VTM-4 system blowing smoke in that situation, I think sblvro is trying to blow smoke up someones you know what :D. Its very reliable. I can only recall one rear diff repair, and I think it was do to leaking seals. Additionally, post 2004, the trannys have also been very solid.
 
#13 ·
Before asking if a car could get out of that ditch, I'd ask why was it in there to begin with? The Subie or the Pilot would be very well equipped for keeping you out of the ditch, unless you were being stupid.

BTW, the 03 Pilot does not have traction control. If all four wheels are on a slippery surface, like a snow-covered road, they will all spin as long as you want them too.
 
#15 ·
they should make the MDX AWD system for the new pilot instead of the carryover VTM4.
 
#16 ·
By no means am I an expert on the matter, but I owned a 2005 Subaru Outback up until October of this year when I traded it in for my 2007 EXL Pilot (due to a growing family).

I love the Pilot, but nowhere near as much as I loved the Outback. The constant AWD in Subaru's is amazing and I miss it. The fuel mileage in the Pilot is absolutely atrocious. I do a lot of city driving and it's costing $60 to fill up and I've yet to get above 250 miles - the Subaru has much better mileage and won't cost as much to fill up.

If you don't need the storage space/8 seats, I'd be buying a Forester/Outback (the new model Outback is incredible).
 
#17 ·
Well, my last car was an 06 Subaru Impreza.. 50$ Cdn to fill it, gave me about 450km / tank.. (figure about 280mi), with my 05 Pilot EXL, it now costs me 75$cdn to fill (argh) and get 280mi (450km) about.. obviously it's a much larger vehicle, but no regrets. I do miss my Subaru (I'm a die hard subaru junkie.. still am..) but needed a larger car due to my growing family, and want to be able to pull a pop-up trailer, boat, etc..

I did look at a used Tribeca, but you can only get about 200mi / tank!! horrible milage from what I saw..
 
#18 ·
I like the Tribeca as well. The size is just about perfect for us - we rarely use the third row, and when we do it's for short jaunts with the kids in the way back and adults in the second row. But given its relatively small size, it's even more of a gas hog than the Pilot. As much as we like my wife's Legacy, I am hopeful that they redesign it before it's time to trade in the Pilot in 2013. Otherwise, I'll be giving a close look to Ford (or perhaps another Pilot, if Honda takes care of the few complaints I have with the current model).
 
#19 ·
A year ago I traded in my Pilot for a Tribeca. I average 17.4 MPG on my mixed commute. I averaged about the same in my Pilot. The big fault to the Tribeca is it only has 16 gal fuel tank!

In all other respects the Tribeca fits me better than my 2007 Pilot. I LOVE IT! The big knock is the tiny third row but I never plan to use it. I have never had more than 4 in the car. Most times only 1.
 
#20 ·
I miss subaru. The quality is outstanding.. as good as Honda, except honda retains their value more! =)

We'll see in the future.. for now we're planning on another child next year, a dog, a popup trailer, and we camp alot.. we need the room!
 
#21 ·
Let me begin by saying I am die hard Honda fan. I loved owning and driving the Pilot and Ridgeline. My wife has been driving an 97 Subie Outback for the past 157K miles. We live in ice and snow country. The Subie AWD simply kicks butt out in the snow and ice when compared to driving the Honda and Jeep products in our garage to work. The Subie is more responsive and just feels better "planted" in the snow and on wet weather roads. We run top of the line tires on all our vehicles. She will drive this Subie AWD car till the wheels fall off. Just my $.02.
 
#22 ·
We own a 2003 Honda Pilot 4wd and a 2008 Suburu Impreza AWD. We live in the mountains at almost 6000' elevation, and my wife and me both commute down the mountain to work. She just about always prefers to take the Suburu. Its lower, feels more in control in ice and snow and the back end doesnt kick out like it does in our Pilot. Getting out of our driveway is a different story... in deep snow, the Pilot is by far better due to larger wheels, more ground clearance and the VTM lock. At least when the Suburu gets stuck, it doesnt take very much to get it unstuck.
 
#23 ·
She just about always prefers to take the Suburu. Its lower, feels more in control in ice and snow and the back end doesnt kick out like it does in our Pilot.
We are Honda devotees, and we own a 2007 Pilot and a 2005 Subaru Outback. Based upon our experiences, We agree that the Subaru is better in the worst conditions. Keep in mind that tires make a huge difference.

Subaru has several different 4wd systems. Ours puts down power separately to diagonal wheels (drivers side front/pass. side rear and vice versa). No traction control. It was originally skiddish -- but that year of Outback had an issue with rear alignment which pushed the rear end out driving in slick conditions. Once diagnosed and corrected, it has been rock solid in ice, snow, compact snow, and slush with its Nokian WRG2 tires. When we had to get the hospital in the snow, we took the Subaru.

The Pilot, currently on Mich. M+S2s, is slightly less stable. Part of it is weight. Part of it is a higher center of gravity. Part of it is the 4wd system. It does well in all but the worst winter weather as compared to the Subaru. We drive our Pilot skiing through terrible conditions, and it performs perfectly (this weekend: 13 degree weather, compact ice and snow, chains required in the mountain pass). We've used the VTM lock with the traction control once to drive out of a snowy slope area after a foot and 1/2 of snow. No problem. But it just is not a rock solid as the Subaru, even though our Outback doesn't have traction control.

I should add that I've focused on winter driving b/c of the test. The Subaru performs very well in more traditional 4wd territory -- for us that's on mountain backtracks in various conditions. I wouldn't take it into Jeep territory where you need locking differentials, but it keeps up with the terrain we throw at it.
 
#24 ·
I kind of like this video comparison of the various drive systems vs. Subaru, even though it is a marketing video.

Subaru AWD vs Competition

I remember watching another video of Honda's 4wd system where one wheel was off the road. Can't remember if it was a Pilot or CRV. The system actually shut down because it was working so hard to get power to the wheel that was not in contact with anything (and eliminating the power to the other wheels). The solution is to turn off the traction control. Unfortunately, I cannot locate that video now.
 
#25 ·
Just joined forum, seeing as I am shopping used Pilots; have an 03 Odyssey. I need(or want) a 4WD for Carolina beach driving and WVa mountain dirt road expeditions-will VTM system truly carry me through or just get me, as Garrison Keillor said once, stuck further off the road? Just drove an 06 EX-L, 95K miles, good condition, smooth ride, engine no strange noises, BUT at 65mph+ on smooth pavement, a low non vibration hum or rumble-differential maybe-mechanical or fluid? Please clue me in.
 
#26 ·
I own a 05 Pilot and 06 Subaru Legacy. Love them both and both are very capable in the bad weather. The Subie sure is better on mileage and handles like it's on rails. Very solid and very well built but its also lower to the ground and has much less room. The Pilot has the ground clearance and VTM4 lock feature which is great for when stuck. If you don't need the extra room and if you don't go off road at all, the Subie should be fine. It will cost less to own in the long run. Also, my Pilot blew the ECM shortly after I bought it new and left me stranded (which I realize is rare). My Subie has never stranded me, though it did need a new front wheel bearing. Subarus are very safe and dependable IMO.
 
#27 ·
I really think you guys are compairing apples and oranges here. The Subaru is a CAR!! Much lower center of gravity, and I hope it weighs less. A car will almost always feel better to drive in snow type situations because of its size. It feels "stuck" to the road because of its mass, and again, lower center of gravity. The only time the Pilot might "feel" better in the snow, is when ground clearance is an issue. We had 22" of snow a while back...tried the CRV with full snows, got stuck. Took out the Pilot with Firestone all seanons, and motored off.

I am more of a fan of the CRV's Realtime because there is not a stupid computer to override a simple mechanical operation. The Pilot upsets me when it turns a simple "power on, dig me out" situation into a complicated torque confused mess.
 
#28 · (Edited)
Due to a growing family, I switched from a 2006 Outback 3.0R to a 2006 Pilot EX-L last year. Both safe, reliable, great resale, and can tackle US Forest Service roads to trailheads. The Pilot does fine enough and is a great family hauler, but the Outback had superior handling & traction... much more a driver's car. In rain & snow I can get wheel spin much easier on the Pilot, even with traction control, than I did on the Outback without traction control. (New Outbacks do have traction control, btw.) I even put the same Nokian WRG2 tires on both vehicles. Both vehicles had very similar HP & torque ratings, but Pilot was somewhere over 800lbs heavier.

I'll also add that - surprisingly to me - Outback's ground clearance is greater than Pilot's, at least when I was comparing '06 models to each other. (Both have been redesigned since.) Pretty sure Pilot has better angles of ascent/departure, though.

For those that like to do their research, Subaru actually uses 3 different AWD systems in their vehicles, though they are all Symmetrical AWD. I have had both the standard front-bias and the rear-bias VTD system, and both worked well... rear-bias VTD paired w/6-cyl engine was spectacular, though, from both traction and fun factors.
Here's the scoop directly from Subaru on their 3 systems: SUBARU | Subaru Technology | Symmetrical AWD
 
#29 ·
I live in the Rocky Mountains at 8500' elevation with a 2005 EX at 150k.

In the winter I use Michelin Latitude X-Ice Xi2 (Studless Ice) tires and they perform quite well.

This is Subaru country and most residents swear by them (rarely at them). ;)

The VTM-4 system in the Pilot would be much more useful if it supported the D3/D4 gears.

My next car will probably be a Subaru (Forester/Tribeca) unless future Pilot's adopt the new MDX 4wd system.

I am hoping for a Subaru/Honda hybrid suv in light of future petroleum costs.

I concur the higher center of gravity significantly affects the comparision of 4wd systems in Honda SUV's, Subaru SUV's, and Subaru cars.:cool:
 
#31 ·
I currently own a 2004 Subaru Forester and 2006 Honda Pilot and my husband has a 2006 Forester. I previously owned a 2000 Subaru Legacy wagon which I sold to a friend and now is running with over 200,000 miles on it. The best AWD of the bunch goes to the Legacy Wagon. All work well, but that Legacy was like glue on bad roads and snow and ice.
The pilot became a much better bad weather vehicle when I switched to Cross Terrain tires. I would figure out what else you need in a vehicle. The Pilot is much bigger and powerful but will get worse gas mileage. Also, test drive the Forester's, they are not as comfortable as a car or the Pilot. Really comparing apples and oranges. The Forester is more comparable to a CRV or RAV4.
 
#32 ·
Two snow storms in 3 months, the first 20+ inches, and the most recent 18+ inches and my 2004 Honda Pilot EXL drove right through the unplow snow. I had to venture out during both storms in addition with the smaller streets not being plowed, wet heavy sticky snow, and managed to get to where I was going with no problem, all the while never having to engage the VTM 4wd system. I have never driven a Subaru but have heard many great things regarding the vehicle, but I found out during these two blizzards that my Pilot is certainly a beast of a vehicle and puts my mind at ease when I or my wife are driving through a snow storm with our four kids in tow. This is our first vehicle with AWD/4WD/whatever you really call this system on our the Pilot, and if there are better AWD/4WD systems out there, I certainly got a bargain for what I paid for for my Pilot.
 
#33 ·
Just a quick note as I think you may misunderstand the system a bit. VTM-4 is on *always*. It will engage the rear wheels when accelerating from a stop and when underway, it will engage them as the wheels slip.

The control you see on the dash can be confusing. It reads "VTM-4 LOCK", which is exactly what it says - it applies torque front and rear equally (not necessarily a good thing depending on conditions) and only works under 17MPH and in selector positions 1 and 2. It is only used for completely STUCK conditions.