Honda Pilot - Honda Pilot Forums banner

1 - 2 of 2 Posts

486 Posts
Discussion Starter #1
Here is an article on the Pilot from Most of you know this stuff but for those still shopping, read on:

ASHEVILLE, NC – Honda Motor Co. Ltd.’s June 3 introduction of the '03 Pilot, its first-ever Honda-badged midsize SUV, is a good example of auto makers heading in different directions.

Honda says midsize SUV buyers don't want bold, Dodge Ram-type styling.
In the first full year of production, Honda plans to sell 80,000 Pilots (priced at about $30,000) as a competitor to Ford Motor Co.’s industry standard Explorer and the recently reinvigorated General Motors Corp. stalwart for the segment, the Chevrolet TrailBlazer.

The day following Pilot’s introduction, GM – basking of late in congratulatory press about its robust truck/SUV sales – nevertheless felt compelled to sweetened by $750 an already handsome incentive package available for the TrailBlazer, an all-new model that's barely been in the market a year.

As for Ford, by the Pilot’s on-sale date, the auto maker had for months been eating a $1,500 rebate to move the once-unassailable Explorer – despite a dramatic redesign of the '02 model, including a costly independent rear suspension in the quest for refinement of its truck-based underpinnings.

After driving the Pilot here, on the road and in some manmade trials that prove the Pilot the approximate off-road equal of its truck-framed competitors, rest assured there won't be incentives on Pilot in its first year.

It pummels the rude and rickety Explorer in any comparison you'd care to make, and although it concedes certain points to the TrailBlazer, the Pilot's embarrassingly better-assembled, exhibits superior-grade interior materials and design and presents an overall look and feel of craftsmanship the Chevrolet can't match.

The final nail: The Pilot's cheaper.

Then again, that's essentially been Honda's winning formula from day one. First it was midsize cars. Then it was minivans. Now Honda's introducing a remarkable new competitor in yet another segment dominated by the domestics. And once again, the domestic auto makers' best-selling efforts are immediately outclassed.

Wearing their least-confrontational personas, Honda officials are quick to say they don't believe Pilot will cut into Explorer or TrailBlazer sales.

Dan Bonawitz, American Honda Motor Co. Inc.'s vice president-corporate planning and logistics (and the kind of tuned-in "car guy" the domestics desperately need), says, "While we may be able to take a few sales from these well-entrenched nameplates, our primary focus will be on import-brand customers and particularly our current owners and Honda loyalists."

Those are nice, non-fightin' words, but if you believe the Pilot's presence has no impact on the domestics' position in the midsize SUV segment, then you probably believe Taurus still is the country's best-selling car. A look at the charts on these pages shows that domestic share in the midsize SUV segment is dropping steadily, and the Explorer – even though it still sells in excess of 300,000 units – just ain't the market juggernaut it used to be.

"Frame-twister" demonstrates Pilot's chassis stiffness and that it's capable of some relatively serious wheel articulation.
Although Bonawitz diplomatically avoids saying the Pilot will trounce Explorer if there's even a hint of comparison shopping, he can't resist invoking the specter of Odyssey, which sent DaimlerChrysler AG's minivan developers and marketers crying for their mamas and sullied DC's 15-year reputation as the maker of the world's most-desirable minivans:

"Like the Odyssey before it, we believe the Pilot will set a new standard for vehicles in the segment," he says.

Okay, one seasoned journalist surveyed the multitude of cupholders and the ketchup-package holder in the EX's rear-seat center console and summated: "Four-wheel-drive Odyssey."

That's more than a little true, of course, since the Pilot, like the Acura MDX that came before it, borrows heavily from the Odyssey minivan chassis. But there's a beefy boxed perimeter for the unibody that says this thing can handle the medium-duty trails atvarious U.S. off-road parks used by Honda during development. Moreover, the Odyssey remains the best minivan on Earth, so you could do worse for inspiration.

The Pilot's minivan genetic code means you're awarded the segment's biggest interior cargo volume: 90.3 cu.-ft. (2,557L) versus 81.3 (2,302L) for Explorer and 80.1 (2,268) for TrailBlazer. Toyota Motor Corp.'s Highlander, also a player but one that doesn't offer as much ruggedness potential, rings in with 81.4 cu.-ft. (2,305L).

A standard sheet of plywood lies flat when Pilot's two rear seat rows are dropped.
Fold Pilot's two rear seat rows flat into the floor – following the slickest formula we've yet seen to do so – and the cargo bay that awaits gobbles the vaunted 4X8 sheet of building material. Forget that trick with any competitor.

Yet the Pilot manages to look, well, manageable, thanks to a length that’s shorter than Explorer and TrailBlazer. Width is Pilot's trump card, where it beats everything in the class and affords a real Barcalounger feel – at least to the first two rows; Honda admits the third-row, belted for three, "was optimized for children."

Front and rear independent suspensions each enjoy subframe mounting, and rack-and-pinion handles the steering, meaning Pilot's not a handful to corner. Ground clearance is a respectable 8 ins. (20 cm) and the only wheel/tire package is a decent 235/70-16. Acura's MDX handles more assertively largely thanks to its 17-in. (43-cm) rubber, but Pilot's no pig – it just understeers more than you'd prefer, at least until you remember the size of the box you're driving.

Pilot's sizable, yes, but doesn't "drive" heavy like so many body-on-frame SUVs. Honda brags that at 4,439 lb. (2,014 kg), Pilot is the lightest 8-passenger SUV in the market. The comparatively low mass yields best-in-class acceleration and passing, according to Honda's claims – surpassing even the TrailBlazer and its superb 4.2L DOHC I-6, an engine the Pilot's chief powertrain engineer openly admires.

Pilot's powerplant hardly is a slacker, what with it being almost directly carried over from the high-falutin' MDX. The 3.5L DOHC V-6 is enhanced by Honda's VTEC variable valve timing and lift and its 240 hp is as stout as anything in the class except for the TrailBlazer's above-mentioned mill, which needs another half-liter of displacement to beat the Pilot by 30 horses.

Pilot is slightly more frugal than its midsize SUV playmates: 17 mpg (13.8L/100 km) in the city and 22 mpg (10.7L/100 km) on the highway. Our experience with Hondas often proves the opposite of most "official" mileage ratings: You actually might do better.

The VTEC V-6 is backed by the standard fitment of a buttery 5-speed automatic and Honda's neat-and-easy VTM-4 all-wheel-drive system. VTM-4, made by BorgWarner Inc., doesn't have a low-range transfer case or any of that lever-throwing off-road stuff, acting, as it does most of the time, like a front-drive-only layout, with the rear wheels taking torque only when a front wheel begins to slip.

Pilot's interior is finished to high standard.
Inside, the Pilot reflects its somewhat staid sheetmetal: everything's solidly crafted and assembled, material choice befits the sticker (can't say that for the Explorer or the TrailBlazer), and everything's sensibly arranged in that voluminous interior, plus the bonus of plenty of well-developed nifty mini-features. If you need a thousand idiotic little switches and automatic foot-warming floormats, look elsewhere.

There's the Honda-typical trim choice of LX ($26,900) or EX ($29,270), and you have to plump for the EX to get any of the three major options of leather ($1,250 added to the EX), DVD rear entertainment system (add $1,500 to the EX with leather) and DVD-based navigation (add an ambitious $2,000 to the EX with leather).

It seems apparent from the growth of the imports and the slide of the domestics that the Pilot's formula is the new SUV order. Buyers want refinement and good performance – both come easier when employing the car-based unibody layouts favored by the imports. It's certainly nice to have some off-road capability – and Pilot's got more than I can imagine typical suburban SUV-weenies ever testing – but vehicles such as the Pilot don't hide behind the facade of Rubicon-conquering off-road prowess, they just offer what's needed to get through a bad winter with confidence.

The ’03 Pilot moves the needle not because of its styling or driveline innovation or anything remotely radical. The Pilot's simply the best blend yet of the attributes realistic buyers want from a $30,000-plus SUV purchase.

Sure, there are plenty of strong-selling SUVs still running around on truck frames and solid rear axles, but Pilot's inevitable success only will underscore the futility of relying much longer on that tired formula.

481 Posts
That's a nice review, albeit one sided. . .I had considered the Trailblazer (didn't really look at explorer, for obvious reasons), even test driving one. Just didn't have the feel, fit, or finish of the Pilot - the best packaged SUV on the market.
1 - 2 of 2 Posts