Honda Pilot - Honda Pilot Forums banner

Elite versus Touring

1 reading
77K views 88 replies 35 participants last post by  blairellis  
#1 ·
Trying to determine if the Elite trim is worth an extra $4-5K. My wife really wants a heated steering wheel and rear heated seats but Honda decided that would only be available on the Elite even though similiar vehicles 5+ years old had those options on lower trims. As far as I can tell the big differences between the Elite and Touring are the above items, the HUD (which she would turn off anyway), the perforated and ventilated front seats, the 110V plug, automatic folding mirrors. Am i missing anything else to compel almost $5K higher MSRP?

Having tested out the 23 pathfinder and 23 pallisade, the pilot just seems better put together with a smoother ride and quieter cabin. Pathfinder was quiet but suspension was rougher and the cabin space felt smaller than it was (and by measurements is smaller than her current 2016 pathfinder). Pallisade had all kinds of cabin noise although the tech was much better and had a nice interior. In the end we are pretty convinced the Pilot is the right vehicle, just having a hard time spending mid/high $50s for a Honda (its been about 5 years since I bought a car but for mid fiftys i would have expected a luxury brand. Touring trim seems like a good compromise although i may be missing something on the differences between Touring and Elite.

Welcome any thoughts.
 
#70 ·
You buying that from the wiper black market?
I haven't bought a wiper under $20 in years.
Maybe I need to shop where you do LOL
Hmmm?

If you did it the "right way" you would buy the Honda OEM rubber inserts. They work really well and last a long time and they are cheap especially if you buy them in multiples off some Honda dealer on Ebay etc. At least that used to be the case last time I ordered. No need to pay for expensive metal frames etc when you can keep your OEM frames and just change the rubber
 
#71 · (Edited)
This thread has really taken a weird turn. Why would anyone think that a manufacturer would put rain sensing on the rear glass for the rear wiper? And if they did, the price of the vehicle would increase and then people would complain.

Also, who wants a wiper scraping across a dry, dirty windshield? Wipers are cheap but why abuse it for no reason? Also, you can mar and put scratch’s in the rear glass as well. Just because we want leave it in auto? Ok, that’s just strange.

Edit: you put this feature and it’s exact function on a CX-90 or a Grand Highlander and people would rave about it.
 
#74 · (Edited)
So what is the purpose of having auto wipers if you don't set them to auto and leave the switch alone?
Most manufacturers recommend leaving the wipers off and only switching them to auto when it begins to rain. The rationale for this is other objects and lighting can trigger the sensor to turn the wipers on when it’s not raining.

The wiper interval is intended to be the automatic feature - not the on/off operation itself.

Page 230 in the manual:
Image

The wiper interval is intended to be the automatic feature - not the on/off operation itself.

Page 230 in the manual:
 
#85 ·
Just recently took home an Elite. We needed the 360 cameras. On our minivan, it’s probably saved us thousands by avoiding parking scrapes, curb rash and alignments. The HUD was a pleasant surprise as it also relays Apple Maps directions and vented seats are always welcome in Texas. Our kids also love the pano sunroof and it has, so far, supplanted the Blu-ray player and screens of the minivan. I appreciate the acoustic glass and immediately noticed the quietness on light throttle even at freeway speeds.

After the honeymoon period, I can start complaining about the 10-speed hunting for first gear. :p