![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
| Register | Home | Forums | Active Topics | Insurance | Photo Gallery | Garage | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read | Auto Escrow | Auto Loans |
![]() |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools |
Rating:
|
|
|
#16 (permalink) |
|
Registered User
Join Date: May 2012
Location: Long Island
Posts: 237
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
|
I think the answer is pretty simple. If you drive 72 mph, even if the posted speed limit is 70, you will not get the vehicle-rated gas mileage. Unfortunately, the manufacturers do not consider each road's posted speed limit when they establish their mpg claims. The choice is, either slow down to near 55 mph to save gas or speed up to 72 mph to save time. Even if you had chosen a hybrid, you would still get way lower than the claimed vehicle-rated gas mileage if driving at 72 mph. But if you can't live with that, my only suggestion is to trade in the Pilot and buy electric. But, then, you can't expect to go as far on each "tank fill". Sorry, but that's the reality - at least at this point in technology.
|
|
|
|
| Sponsored Links | |||
Advertisement | |||
|
|
#17 (permalink) |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Sep 2012
Location: Tierra Verde, FL
Posts: 51
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
|
I am not looking for sympathy or help, I am complaining about the poor gas mileage of my vehicle. Simply wondering if others are experiencing the same mileage or better. Yahooligan has expressed that he got markedly better mileage with a AWD pilot, mileage that I think my vehicle should at least duplicate. If you are going to infer incorrect information or insult me, simply do no post.
Last edited by jmustico4; 12-31-2012 at 09:24 AM. |
|
|
|
|
|
#18 (permalink) |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Dec 2012
Location: Dallas, TX
Posts: 20
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
|
no two cars are same, I have 2013 2wd and I am getting 18.5 MPG.
This mileage is at me driving 60-65 miles per hour speed. the only company whose cars come close to the mileage at speed 60-65 is Toyota. if you drive a Toyota at 55-60 speed it will beat the EPA mileage. I knew this before getting the pilot, i have been driving rental car daily for over 16 months now and have driven both Honda's and Toyota's. I know this is a pilot discussion. But I have friends who have 2012 odyssey 4wd ex-l which gives mileage of 23.5MPG. And that is me driving. we went to look at odyssey and fell in love with Pilot. There are few things which i am trying to get better mileage. I will post a scanned copy of it here. It comes from a hybrid Prius manual. Last edited by pilot2013; 12-31-2012 at 11:39 AM. |
|
|
|
|
|
#19 (permalink) |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: Long Island NY
Posts: 390
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
|
Hey Pilot2013.......You don't have a hybrid, so the attached document above does not apply.
Also never heard of a 2012 odyssey with AWD. To the original poster....... Keep track of you mileage for a longer period of time. It will rule out discrepensies with fuel filler shut off. Set the tire pressure a little higher, I run 40 psi. Don't warm the car up, start it and drive within 30 seconds to 1 minute. You may be doing these already, but they are just a few thoughts. I get between 22 and 25 mpg with my 2010 EX-L AWD on the highway. There is a sweet spot right around 65 mph that works for me. Above 70 I see the mpg start to drop steadily to around 20-21 Last edited by 2010exl; 12-31-2012 at 07:57 PM. |
|
|
|
|
|
#20 (permalink) | |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Dec 2012
Location: Dallas, TX
Posts: 20
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
|
does everyone here have a high nose. Anybody with brains will read through it and then use only what applies. I don't think that includes you.
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#21 (permalink) | |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: WA State
Posts: 2,045
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
|
Quote:
Honda Pilot MPG Reports | Fuelly As others have said, you can't draw too many conclusions based on a single trip and you can't rely on the computer being accurate until you can calibrate it against hand-computed data. There are two many variables - variance in the fuel slosh shutouts of the two different gas pumps involved, the attitude of the vehicle when it was being fueled, winds, traffic, terrain, etc. Especially wind - it is very difficult to make an overall assessment of whether a wind is headwind/tailwind and even a direct crosswind has a headwind component that slows the vehicle. A 5mph headwind at 70+ speeds can easily cost a couple mpg. (In reasonably flat terrain, how much weight you have in the interior of the vehicle generally isn't significant to highway mileage.) You have to gather information long-term and then see how you stand against the data. 72-mph cruising is not generally going to return the EPA highway fuel mileage rating. If everything is ideal, I'd estimate it should get 22-23 or so at this speed. The 3-4 mpg discrepency might be something wrong with your car, but I bet it is other factors that happened to break the wrong way on this particular trip. I'd certainly take more data - open an account on fuelly.com and start logging your fillups, it's especially easy if you have a smartphone - and if you the car can't break 20 mpg at 70, I'd take it in. Good luck. - Mark Last edited by whizmo; 12-31-2012 at 02:27 PM. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#24 (permalink) |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: Wisconsin
Posts: 185
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
|
Try removing the crossbars and see if your mpg goes up.
Pilot2013, SUV's mpg goes down the faster you drive more noticeably than a car does due to the increased wind resistance. My 05 Acura TL will get 30mpg highway with the cruise set at 80. The rated highway mpg is only 26. If I set the cruise at 60 I bet I'd get about 34mpg.
__________________
2012 Pilot 4WD Touring - PMM 2010 Pilot 4WD Touring - White - Traded 2005 Acura TL - SSM 2000 Acura TL - Totaled 2004 Jetta GLI - Sold |
|
|
|
|
|
#27 (permalink) | |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Dec 2012
Location: Dallas, TX
Posts: 20
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
|
Is it standard with all Acura's or is your car a exception.
I would think crossbars probally reduce the millage by a mile or two max on full tank, if they do. I did read some thread here where the cross bars were turned the wrong way and it causing wind noise. Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#28 (permalink) | |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Nov 2012
Location: Markaham
Posts: 1
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
|
Quote:
Yours is probbaly not broken in yet >>>i have a 2012 touring with 18k miles and I push it to 75 with better milage ! it got bettter at 12 k or so ! |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#29 (permalink) |
|
Registered User
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Chicago, NW Burbs
Posts: 13,819
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
|
1) not broken in
2) Winter Fuel, or high Eth fuel (even in FL) 3) Cross bars (check direction), running boards, windows open, AC on, Hood deflector, etc. 3) Alignment: Even a slightly out of align car will get worse mileage (May be "in spec" but not optimum) 4) Driving style (Not just gas use (you said cruse control) but brake use and how steady the steering will affect MPG 5) Measurement errors.
__________________
However beautiful the strategy, you should occasionally look at the results. Sir Winston Churchill |
|
|
|
|
|
#30 (permalink) |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: Northern Virginia
Posts: 514
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
|
The aerodynamic "brick" known as the Honda Pilot can be quite odd ( at least indicated mileage) when it comes to obtaining optimum/peak mileage. Sometimes running faster, despite increased wind resistance, has yielded better mileage for me which doesn't really make much sense in a vehicle this flat and square breaking a large hole going down the road.
I find a good coat of wax is good for an extra 2 m.p.g.. ;-)
__________________
Rob 2011 w.d.p. Touring 4x4, DeepWater Edition(it has a propeller on the back ;-) ) Last edited by 1YESfan; 01-02-2013 at 06:14 PM. |
|
|
|
| Sponsored Links | |
Advertisement | |
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Rate This Thread | |
|
|