![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
| Register | Home | Forums | Active Topics | Insurance | Photo Gallery | Garage | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read |
![]() |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Rate Thread |
|
|
#31 (permalink) | |||
|
Registered User
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Chicago, NW Burbs
Posts: 13,555
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
|
Quote:
Quote:
We could get 44 with a diesel 25 years ago, and "maybe" will get 50 to 60 (more likely 50) in 2008. This seems like a small gain. Quote:
Most of those "high Mileage contest cars use very little "new" technology, and simply reduce weight and drag in ways that are not practical for a "usable" vehicle.
__________________
However beautiful the strategy, you should occasionally look at the results. Sir Winston Churchill |
|||
|
|
|
| Sponsored Links | |||
Advertisement | |||
|
|
#32 (permalink) | |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Pewaukee WI
Posts: 1,605
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
|
Quote:
The Accord and Rabbit are anything but "big, heavy vehicles". The biggest obstacle up until now has been emissions for diesel passenger vehicles (none could meet CA emissions standards). Manufacturers are promising cleaner diesel vehicles in the near future, but then there's the question about how reliable these newer one will be as well as how their performance will compare. Everyone keeps raving about wanting more diesel vehicles. I'm cautiously optimistic.
__________________
1995 Yamaha FZR600 2005 Honda Pilot EX-L (Desert Rock Metallic, side steps, crossbars, rear splash guards, wheel locks, towing package, full-size spare on EX rim) 2007 Honda Accord EX-L V6 sedan (Alabaster Silver Metallic, splash guards, wheel locks) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#33 (permalink) | |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: WA State
Posts: 1,817
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
|
Quote:
The steady-state speed for optimal mileage is actually quite low, around 35-40 mph for most vehicles. But even at this unrealisitcally low cruise speed and on perfectly level ground with no wind, a Pilot would probably only return mileage in the low-30's. This would be the absolute theoretical limit - no driver technique would be involved since the car would be crusiing at it's most efficient steady speed. I view internet heresay about 39 mpg MDX's very skeptically. - Mark |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#34 (permalink) |
|
Super Senior Member
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Red Sox Nation
Posts: 7,177
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
|
IF you start at the top of a mountain, and glide down in neutral relying on the brakes to slow you, you'l probably do 40mpg for the 2-3 miles it takes to get to the bottom
an instant MPG read out would be far more useful than the A/B trip meters |
|
|
|
|
|
#36 (permalink) | |
|
Senior Member
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Quote:
Maybe that is what the idiots were doing on our "interstate" here the other day. People were having to swerve around them during rush hour to keep from rear ending them.That is a good way to get killed by not driving along with the flow of traffic. BigDozer66
__________________
2007 Pilot EX-L RES, Taffeta White, WWong Side Step Pads, Pads & Lens Protectors, Rear Splash Guards, Tint, WeatherTech Window Deflectors & Cargo Liner, Honda Side Steps, DealExtreme LED's, Billet Lower Grille, BF Goodrich Long Trail T/A's |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#37 (permalink) |
|
Junior Member
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Jacksonville, Fl
Posts: 4
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
|
If one wanted to take a close look, you could visit the following web site:
http://www.cleanmpg.com/ and take a look in the "Mileage Logs" section and see if there are any pilot owners who have acheived anything close to this figure. My personal thoughts are that it's quite possible to get 40 mpg while coasting.. or rolling down a hill, or if cruising at 45 mph 1' behind a semi even.. for a short perid of time, but my experience has been ('05 (awd)) that I'm lucky to get mid to lower 20's over the course of a whole tank of gas... At the same time, there is something to driving technique, ie, one who brakes less will turn less kinetic energy into heat on the brake pads, but, I would say that it's very unrealistic to expect anything even close to 40 mpg in the long term in a pilot.. I have a hard enough time getting a 30MPG avg in my accord.. (even when being concientously (not sure if that's even a word)) I was able to get >45 MPG on one tank in my father's Prius and >49 in another, but to expect close to 40 MPG in a pilot is not realistic.. A quick story of warning about "drafting" for mileage.... I was driving (with the family) along I-10 from San Antonio to Jacksonville, FL this past January.. Decided that I would "chill out" and follow a truck who was going a very reasonable speed. (in the Pilot) All was well, the family was asleep and all, and without much warning, the truch in front of me (I wasn't following excessively close thank God) swerved to the "passing lane" in a break in the traffic in that lane... and there was a **Stopped** maintenance truck of some sort in my lane of travel reporting that the right lane was closed ahead... Uh Oh. At this point, I can report that the Pilot's brakes will haul down a family of 4 and their dog and luggage quite well.. (Probably the quickest that i've braked in this car anyways..) It was unexpected, and I was frustrated, but I tell this as a warning to those who would decide to follow closely to a truck in front of them.. you don't know what they're thinking..
__________________
2005 Pilot EX-L 2004 Accord V6 (AEM V2 intake) 1999 Miata (flyin miata turbo) |
|
|
|
| Sponsored Links | |
Advertisement | |
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Rate This Thread | |
|
|