Mid/Large sports sedan - Honda Pilot - Honda Pilot Forums

Register Home Forums Active Topics Insurance Photo Gallery Garage Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read
Piloteers.org is the premier Honda Pilot Forum on the internet. Registered Users do not see the above ads.
Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Rate Thread
Old 05-12-2010, 11:54 AM   #1 (permalink)
Registered User
 
N_Jay's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Chicago, NW Burbs
Posts: 13,555
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
Default Mid/Large sports sedan

It looks like we are replacing our CRV with a new (to us) vehicle, and it will be a (Used 2007-2008) mid/large luxury/sports sedan.

Well, actually, it seems I am replacing my 2002 CRV with a well maintained but high mileage 2003 Pilot (Go figger), while my wife replaces her 2003 well maintained but high mileage 2003 Pilot with a sports sedan.

The reason it has to be mid to large is we still take 800 to 900 mile trips and our youngest is now pushing 6 foot.

So with the desire for some form of 4WD and a touch of luxury the short list is:
Acura RL
MB E350
Lexus GS350
Infinity M35X
Audi A-6

Since most here are familiar with Honda reliability, I am hoping not to end up with too much more trouble than our Hondas have provided.

Anyone have any recommendations?
__________________
However beautiful the strategy, you should occasionally look at the results.
Sir Winston Churchill
N_Jay is offline   Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links
Advertisement
 
Old 05-12-2010, 12:07 PM   #2 (permalink)
Registered User
 
dustino8's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: SK, Canada
Posts: 764
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
Default

If you've got the Audi A6 on your list, you should probably include VW Passat and Infinity G37 also. I'd probably add the TL too. Does RWD, FWD, AWD matter?

I foresee a lot of fun test drives ahead for you.
__________________
2003 SS EX-L; Sidesteps, aftermarket hitch and tranny cooler, prodigy brake controller, Airlift 1000

2007 Toyota Tundra

Dearly departed 1991 Prelude and 2005 Civic
dustino8 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-12-2010, 12:10 PM   #3 (permalink)
Super Senior Member

 
sblvro's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: chicago&michigan&arkansas
Posts: 2,043
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
Default

I like the GS350, reliable, fast, nice interior and will keep you out of the service area.
__________________
2003 starlight silver pilot EX-LRES
2003 black onyx Lexus IS300
1988 mitsubishi galant sigma 203000 miles and running
2006 evolution IX MR(RIP)
2009 black raven escalade hybrid

http://www.doctorownedcars.com/
sblvro is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-12-2010, 12:38 PM   #4 (permalink)
Registered User
 
N_Jay's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Chicago, NW Burbs
Posts: 13,555
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
Default

I was thinking that the Passat was A-4 not A-6 sized?

The TL and G37 seem a little small in the rear seat.

We drove an Avalon, and it is about the right size, but did not have 4WD/AWD and was a little boring.

We have not driven the GS350 yet. It seems that if my wife does not mind a little less power, a low mileage 2006 GS300 is a real bargain.
__________________
However beautiful the strategy, you should occasionally look at the results.
Sir Winston Churchill
N_Jay is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-12-2010, 12:46 PM   #5 (permalink)
Registered User
 
dustino8's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: SK, Canada
Posts: 764
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by N_Jay View Post
I was thinking that the Passat was A-4 not A-6 sized?

The TL and G37 seem a little small in the rear seat.

We drove an Avalon, and it is about the right size, but did not have 4WD/AWD and was a little boring.

We have not driven the GS350 yet. It seems that if my wife does not mind a little less power, a low mileage 2006 GS300 is a real bargain.
Jetta is A4 sized, Passat is A6 sized. If the TL and G37 seem small in the rear, I'm sure an A6 will too. I'm guessing you're gonna end up with a Lexus, especially if you want something at the top of reliability.
__________________
2003 SS EX-L; Sidesteps, aftermarket hitch and tranny cooler, prodigy brake controller, Airlift 1000

2007 Toyota Tundra

Dearly departed 1991 Prelude and 2005 Civic
dustino8 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-12-2010, 12:55 PM   #6 (permalink)
Registered User
 
N_Jay's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Chicago, NW Burbs
Posts: 13,555
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by dustino8 View Post
Jetta is A4 sized, Passat is A6 sized. If the TL and G37 seem small in the rear, I'm sure an A6 will too. I'm guessing you're gonna end up with a Lexus, especially if you want something at the top of reliability.
We did not sit in the back of the TL, put the Accord is a bit smaller than we wanted.

Looking at the MB E350 it may also be just on the edge.


Anyone have any experience with the M35x. It drove well, but I don't think Infinity/Nissan has quite caught up with Honda/Acura and Toyota/Lexus in overall quality and low maintenance.
__________________
However beautiful the strategy, you should occasionally look at the results.
Sir Winston Churchill
N_Jay is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-12-2010, 01:09 PM   #7 (permalink)
Super Senior Member

 
jl_ss's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: MA
Posts: 3,860
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by N_Jay View Post
We did not sit in the back of the TL, put the Accord is a bit smaller than we wanted.

Looking at the MB E350 it may also be just on the edge.


Anyone have any experience with the M35x. It drove well, but I don't think Infinity/Nissan has quite caught up with Honda/Acura and Toyota/Lexus in overall quality and low maintenance.
The M35X gets an overall CR reliability rating of "better than average", while the RL only gets an "average" rating. The GS300 AWD gets a "much worse than average" rating.
jl_ss is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-12-2010, 01:51 PM   #8 (permalink)
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: SoCal
Posts: 916
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
Default

I think you're on the right track. I'm guessing that if you have a kid pushing 6 feet, the parents are at least that tall also and that kind of length in the front and backseat for 11+ hours eliminates the smaller mid-sized (TL, G37, E-Class, A6) sedans. The M is bigger than all of those, as well as the GS..and the interior feels very roomy and high-end. I agree that Nissan/Infiniti hasn't caught up to Honda or Toyota in reliability, but the 3.5L is the same engine that Nissan uses in just about everything and the 5 speed auto in the M is outdated but sturdy. If you can avoid the first year (2006), the overall reliability should be acceptable.

Disclaimer: This post contains my opinion and is mostly just an attempt to up my post count.
__________________
Current: 2008 4WD EX-L NAV - OEM Tow Package - OEM Running Boards - Sirius conversion using OEM headunit and antenna - Vizualogic A-1250 Dual DVD Headrests - RGB converter for DVD on NAV screen - Hitch-Haul - Air Lift 1000 - USA-Spec PA15-HON2 - DEI 452T Auto Locks - Thule Crossroads and Cargo Box - Michelin Latitudes

Old: 2005 EX-L NAV
jcantanixon is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-12-2010, 01:53 PM   #9 (permalink)
Registered User
 
N_Jay's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Chicago, NW Burbs
Posts: 13,555
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by jl_ss View Post
The M35X gets an overall CR reliability rating of "better than average", while the RL only gets an "average" rating. The GS300 AWD gets a "much worse than average" rating.
Interesting, A Lexus that gets a "much worse than average" rating.
Anyone wonder if that is really a "much worse than expected" rating?

The only reference I found specifically addressed the underwhelming power. Even that was said to be due to the cars it was competing with. Hmmmm?
__________________
However beautiful the strategy, you should occasionally look at the results.
Sir Winston Churchill
N_Jay is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-12-2010, 02:07 PM   #10 (permalink)
Super Senior Member

 
jl_ss's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: MA
Posts: 3,860
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by N_Jay View Post
Interesting, A Lexus that gets a "much worse than average" rating.
Anyone wonder if that is really a "much worse than expected" rating?

The only reference I found specifically addressed the underwhelming power. Even that was said to be due to the cars it was competing with. Hmmmm?
Here's the whole GS table. From the looks of it I would guess that there is not much difference in reliability between the ratings of much better and much worse than average in that category of vehicle. Premature brake wear seems to be the biggest issue:
Attached Thumbnails
Mid/Large sports sedan-gs.jpg  
jl_ss is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-12-2010, 02:34 PM   #11 (permalink)
Registered User
 
N_Jay's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Chicago, NW Burbs
Posts: 13,555
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by jl_ss View Post
Here's the whole GS table. From the looks of it I would guess that there is not much difference in reliability between the ratings of much better and much worse than average in that category of vehicle. Premature brake wear seems to be the biggest issue:
Can you post the M35x table?
__________________
However beautiful the strategy, you should occasionally look at the results.
Sir Winston Churchill
N_Jay is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-12-2010, 02:39 PM   #12 (permalink)
Super Senior Member

 
jl_ss's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: MA
Posts: 3,860
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by N_Jay View Post
Can you post the M35x table?
Here U go:
Attached Thumbnails
Mid/Large sports sedan-m35awd.jpg  
jl_ss is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-12-2010, 03:25 PM   #13 (permalink)
Registered User
 
dustino8's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: SK, Canada
Posts: 764
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
Default

Odd that the AWD GS is rated below average when the driveline is rated the same as the RWD version, which overall is rated as average or above average depending on the year.
__________________
2003 SS EX-L; Sidesteps, aftermarket hitch and tranny cooler, prodigy brake controller, Airlift 1000

2007 Toyota Tundra

Dearly departed 1991 Prelude and 2005 Civic
dustino8 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-12-2010, 03:58 PM   #14 (permalink)
Super Senior Member

 
jl_ss's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: MA
Posts: 3,860
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by dustino8 View Post
Odd that the AWD GS is rated below average when the driveline is rated the same as the RWD version, which overall is rated as average or above average depending on the year.
The AWD version appears to have slightly more engine major/minor issues than the RWD version.
jl_ss is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-12-2010, 04:00 PM   #15 (permalink)
Registered User
 
TheHiker's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Milwaukee,WI
Posts: 38
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
Default

The G37 will definitely be a little smaller in the backseat compared to some of your other choices.

May I suggest the new Taurus SHO? AWD, sporty, and roomy. Ford's quality has also come a long way. May be worth at least a look.

I do like the Acura RL as well, not sure how much of a sales success it has been but I think it would be a pretty nice choice.
__________________
Family Hauler: 2005 Silver Honda Pilot EX-L
Daily Driver: 2004 Toyota Corolla
Fun car: Not in budget (yet)
TheHiker is offline   Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links
Advertisement
 
Reply


Thread Tools
Rate This Thread
Rate This Thread:

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 02:18 AM.



Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2012, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.3.2
Garage Plus vBulletin Plugins by Drive Thru Online, Inc.
Copyright 2000 piloteers.org. All Rights Reserved.