1959 Chevrolet Bel Air Vs. 2009 Chevrolet Malibu IIHS Offset - Honda Pilot - Honda Pilot Forums

Register Home Forums Active Topics Insurance Photo Gallery Garage Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read
Piloteers.org is the premier Honda Pilot Forum on the internet. Registered Users do not see the above ads.
Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Rate Thread
Old 09-27-2009, 09:26 PM   #1 (permalink)
Maint Master
 
nsaspook's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Fairview Oregon
Posts: 164
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
Default 1959 Chevrolet Bel Air Vs. 2009 Chevrolet Malibu IIHS Offset

Crash test. Some things do get better
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5CU-k0XmLUk
__________________
76 CB360, 78 CB750, 1975 HONDA CIVIC WAGON CVCC, 1982 Honda Civic , 2008 Honda Pilot
Kenwood DDX-812 with KNA-G510 Nav, Infinity 6022si door speakers, MTX 10" Subwoofer upgrade, Alpine SBS-05DC center with JPA460 power amp in 3 channel bridged mode. Rear camera and DTV converter box with second and third row monitor screens. Wired and wireless headphone adapters.
nsaspook is offline   Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links
Advertisement
 
Old 09-28-2009, 08:23 AM   #2 (permalink)
Registered User
 
macphanatic's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Ply. Meeting
Posts: 629
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
Default

As one of the posters pointed out though, the Bel Air was a rust bucket. For all we know, the Bel Air was about to fall apart.

I'm not suggesting that newer cars and the technology aren't safer, just that this test appears to have some issues.
__________________
2007 Pilot EX-L AWD Nav Nimbus Grey, Weathertech Window Deflectors, Cargo Cover, WWong's pads, Blitzsafe Aux Input & Sirius Starbase, Splash Guards, Subframe Braces, DEI 452T auto door lock mod, Fumoto drain valve, Parrot 3200 Bluetooth, Polk db651s & db651, Michelin LTX M/S2

1999 F-250SD XLT SC 4x4 Black & Silver, Stainless Running Boards, Weathertech Window Deflectors, Sirius
macphanatic is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-28-2009, 12:23 PM   #3 (permalink)
Registered User
 
rlapid's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: West Sacramento, California
Posts: 847
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
Default

even if the 59 was brand new, the chance of surviving that type of collision would still be slim. from what i see, the dummy in the 59 only has a lap belt and no airbags!
__________________
2006 Pilot EX-LN 4WD | Taffeta White | "Amelia"

OEM accessories: chrome side steps, crossbars, cargo tray, cargo cover, wheel locks, rear splash guards, door edge guards, full-size spare

Aftermarket accessories: Yakima Big Powderhound, LED license plate and door bulbs, Infinity 6012i speakers, 4300k HID, 35% tint, Nokya yellow fogs + yellow Lamin-X
rlapid is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-28-2009, 03:32 PM   #4 (permalink)
Maint Master
 
nsaspook's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Fairview Oregon
Posts: 164
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
Default

More views. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=d309QCuve7c
__________________
76 CB360, 78 CB750, 1975 HONDA CIVIC WAGON CVCC, 1982 Honda Civic , 2008 Honda Pilot
Kenwood DDX-812 with KNA-G510 Nav, Infinity 6022si door speakers, MTX 10" Subwoofer upgrade, Alpine SBS-05DC center with JPA460 power amp in 3 channel bridged mode. Rear camera and DTV converter box with second and third row monitor screens. Wired and wireless headphone adapters.
nsaspook is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-16-2011, 05:52 PM   #5 (permalink)
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Posts: 413
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by macphanatic View Post
As one of the posters pointed out though, the Bel Air was a rust bucket. For all we know, the Bel Air was about to fall apart.

I'm not suggesting that newer cars and the technology aren't safer, just that this test appears to have some issues.
How do we know it was a rust bucket? Regardless, those old vehicles (and I have and currently do own several) were not designed for safety at all. Though the sheet metal is thicker, the inner support structures and the frames were not specifically engineered to resist crashes at all. The old body on frame design used at that time was not meant to withstand such a crash. The frames were not even built well. They were just stamped sheet, not even boxed and with little cross-bracing or support. I am not surprised that newer cars fare much better.
__________________
2005 LX 4wd
Surco Safari Roof Basket with 3.5 inch 55 Watt lights mounted to it
OEM accessory roof bars
OEM nerf bars
OEM rear splash guards
2006 OEM 4wd emblem
Blacked out front and rear bumper garnish
OEM accessory rubber cargo mat
Garmin GPS
Full size spare on OEM alloy rim
Aftermarket tinted windows
OEM accessory fog light kit
OEM accessory cargo cover
Silver painted grill
Body colored door/side moldings
Acura stainless exhaust tips
KYB GR2 struts/shocks
Curt 13328 Hitch
mclairmo is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-07-2011, 10:37 PM   #6 (permalink)
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: US
Posts: 11
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
Default

Done the same test but guess the output would be the same with both cars.no crumple zones, no seatbelts, no collapsible steering columns... those old led sleds sure look tough, but this video displays the brutal truth. It's true that old cars endanger their occupants in a colision. Would also love to see the cruze on test....

______________________________________

2010 HONDA PILOT EX-L|2010 HONDA PILOT EX-L|2010 HONDA PILOT EX-L
jackjroadster is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-08-2011, 01:44 PM   #7 (permalink)
Site Sponsor
 
hondacuraplanet's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Buffalo, New York
Posts: 2,011
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
Send a message via AIM to hondacuraplanet
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by mclairmo View Post
How do we know it was a rust bucket? Regardless, those old vehicles (and I have and currently do own several) were not designed for safety at all. Though the sheet metal is thicker, the inner support structures and the frames were not specifically engineered to resist crashes at all. The old body on frame design used at that time was not meant to withstand such a crash. The frames were not even built well. They were just stamped sheet, not even boxed and with little cross-bracing or support. I am not surprised that newer cars fare much better.
My '59 Oldsmobile had a frame manufactured of industrial-type I-beams. They looked like they just came out of a foundry.

I agree though, cars today are MUCH safer, and anyone that's driven one of those tanks (like the '55 Century in my driveway) knows that the handling on them is absolutely horrible. Great cars, but they were meant to be driven in a straight line
__________________

www.oemacuraparts.com
hondacuraplanet is offline   Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links
Advertisement
 
Reply


Thread Tools
Rate This Thread
Rate This Thread:

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 02:14 AM.



Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2012, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.3.2
Garage Plus vBulletin Plugins by Drive Thru Online, Inc.
Copyright 2000 piloteers.org. All Rights Reserved.