![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
| Register | Home | Forums | Active Topics | Insurance | Photo Gallery | Garage | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read |
![]() |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Rate Thread |
|
|
#1 (permalink) |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: NY Panhandle(c)
Posts: 2,831
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
|
I just read the whole article and I can't recall one good thing. Yeah, it's got a Brit flavor to it but that's kind of what makes it so funny.
http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/dri...cle6294116.ece My favorite / funniest part: Hmmm. I would not accuse Honda of telling porkies. That would be foolish. But I cannot see how making a car with two motors costs the same in terms of resources as making a car with one. The nickel for the battery has to come from somewhere. Canada, usually. It has to be shipped to Japan, not on a sailing boat, I presume. And then it must be converted, not in a tree house, into a battery, and then that battery must be transported, not on an ox cart, to the Insight production plant in Suzuka. And then the finished car has to be shipped, not by Thor Heyerdahl, to Britain, where it can be transported, not by wind, to the home of a man with a beard who thinks hes doing the world a favour. Why doesnt he just buy a Range Rover, which is made from local components, just down the road? No, really weird-beards buy locally produced meat and vegetables for eco-reasons. So why not apply the same logic to cars?
__________________
2003 EX-L, Sage Brush Pearl Side Steps Rear Splash Guards Cross Bars Cargo Tray Cargo Cover All-Season Floor Mats StreetPilot ColorMap WeatherTech WeatherFlectors Fortera TripleTreds |
|
|
|
| Sponsored Links | |
Advertisement | |
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Rate This Thread | |
|
|