![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
| Register | Home | Forums | Active Topics | Insurance | Photo Gallery | Garage | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read |
![]() |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Rate Thread |
|
|
#1 (permalink) |
|
Junior Member
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Dallas
Posts: 14
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
|
In terms of car safety, Honda Pilot and Acura MDX both recieved 5 stars ratings except rollover rating(Pilot is still to be rated).
Please pardon my knowledge of cars... I heard from friends that Acura MDX is using premium gas, I wonder if that is necessary ? I find the gas cost can be high especially for a SUV. Also, In terms of cost of vehicle, the difference is about $3.5k, is it worth it to get the MDX ? Thanks ! |
|
|
|
| Sponsored Links | |||
Advertisement | |||
|
|
#2 (permalink) |
|
Super Mom Member
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Port Orchard, WA
Posts: 1,997
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
|
Wow- where have you found an MDX so cheap? (Or a Pilot so expensive?)
My main reason for buying the Pilot over the 'X is price. It would have run me at least $6K more for that gorgeous Acura. It was love at first sight, I'm just to dang broke for one ![]() Really the Value is in the Pilot- more cargo space, seats 8 instead of 7, BUT the MDX has a lot more goodies (sunroof!) and 20 more HP than we do. Underpinnings and Engine are both the 3.5L V6, Really paying for LUXE and BADGE with 'X. As for the Premium vs Regular Gasoline issue...I'll leave that to the experts here. Some of these Piloteers are Geniuses! I went for the Pilot and glad I saved the $$$, I love it. Welcome to H-P.ORG!!! You'll find a lot of nice folks here.
__________________
'03 PILOT *Starlight Silver EX-L* FormFit Air deflector, Splash Guards, Honda hitch, Honda All Weather Mats, dead pedal cover from wwong, Westin Oval Sidesteps, MICHELIN Cross Terrains ----------------------------------------- '08 RIDGELINE RTL Formal Black hitch only so far... ----------------------------------------- '02 XR50R The cutest honda ever. ----------------------------------------- |
|
|
|
|
|
#3 (permalink) | |
|
Super Senior Member
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Tampa Bay Area Florida
Posts: 2,479
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
|
Quote:
Anyway the MDX is out of my budget but if it's not out of yours and you're like me you'll want to get perspective from owners of both vehicles. Just keep in mind that Pilots do have the ability to fly.
__________________
Note: If you want to be sure I see a post either quote a message from me or put - florida_guy - somewhere in the body of the post so it shows up when I search. I am trying to stay active without spending too much time here. '03 Pilot EX Sandstone Metallic Options: Cargo Cover OEM Hitch StreetPilot 2610 Sportsworks Transport Bike Carrier |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#4 (permalink) |
|
humanum est errare
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: San Francisco Bay Area
Posts: 1,846
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
|
Edmunds.com TMV
MDX Touring with entertainment: $39,800 Pilot EX-L RES: $31,138 TMV difference: $8,662. Here's an excerpt describing how Honda boosted the HP in the MDX in 2003 from 240 (which is the Pilot's HP level) to 260: By modifying the exhaust system, revising the integrated cylinder heads and installing shorter intake manifold ports, the all-aluminum VTEC V6 goes from 240 to 260 horsepower. Torque is increased from 242 to 250 pound-feet while still meeting ULEV-2 emissions requirements. At 17 mpg city/23 mpg highway, the MDX is more fuel-efficient than many of its thirstier competitors in the SUV class. These changes allow the HP curve to peak higher (5,750 rpm vs 5,400 rpm) but, more importantly, the torque comes on much sooner (MDX 250 ft-lbs peak at 3,500 rpm versus Pilot 242 ft-lbs @ 4,500 rpm). Basically, the Pilot has last year's MDX engine. Is this added performance (plus the sunroof) worth the price differential?
__________________
David 2003 #48853 EX-L RES Sage Brush Pearl [sold 3/10/09] 2009 Sienna XLT Limted AWD 2006 A4 2.0 CVT 2004 X3 3.0 2003 M3Cic 2003 325i (gone) 2003 Matrix XR (total loss) 1996 Landcruiser (gone) |
|
|
|
|
|
#5 (permalink) | |
|
'da Moderator
|
Quote:
1. luxary tag 2. better sound systems 3. better interior finish, leather etc 4. better tires Ofcourse its always different strokes for different folks....
__________________
2005 Blue Audi A4 Cabriolet 3.0 2011 Black Audi Q5 2.0T |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#6 (permalink) | |
|
Member
![]() Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Northern Virginia
Posts: 72
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
|
Quote:
too often, you might end up with a slightly dirtier engine, not to mention less power and probably gas mileage.Exactly how much of each? I'll have to ponder it at the gas pump. (pumping good old regular!) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#7 (permalink) | |||
|
Registered User
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: NY Panhandle(c)
Posts: 2,831
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
|
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
__________________
2003 EX-L, Sage Brush Pearl Side Steps • Rear Splash Guards • Cross Bars • Cargo Tray • Cargo Cover • All-Season Floor Mats • StreetPilot ColorMap • WeatherTech WeatherFlectors • Fortera TripleTreds |
|||
|
|
|
|
|
#8 (permalink) |
|
Junior Member
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Dallas
Posts: 14
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
|
Hi Florida_guy,
I have registered with acuramdx.org but the website forum refused to let me post any article ! not sure why, one possible reason is the web admin need to authorize me ? Have ANYONE tried car consultant/broker company such as : http://www.autopurchaseconsulting.com/ They claimed they could help me to search nation wide car dealer for best price of any new cars (even pilot and MDX) for close to dealer invoice. It sounds attractive to me, wonder if there is any catch... Thanks. |
|
|
|
|
|
#9 (permalink) |
|
Senior Member
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Some people won't hesitate and pick the MDX. It is the "sportier" one ... I think.
If you're like me, you can compare until the cows come home, and you'll still be pondering one over the other ... No matter how/what, you'll find enough reasons to pick one over the other. They're both excellent vehicles for different reasons. I "agonized" over the impending decision before deciding on the Pilot. I had my eyes set on the MDX until the Pilot appeared. I chose the Pilot mainly due to 3 reasons: 1. Cost (about CAD$8K to $10K price difference incl. tax and CAD$500+ per year more for premium gas). 2. Waiting period of 3 months for MDX vs. 3 days for the Pilot. 3. My boss drives an MDX -- an ex-colleague's advice: never drive the same vehicle as your boss. Either get something a lot more costly $$$ (they can't pay you enough to drive it) or buy something less. You'd be perceived to be overpaid ...
|
|
|
|
|
|
#10 (permalink) |
|
Super Senior Member
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: san jose,
Posts: 747
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
|
carsdirect.com also claim that pilot doesn't have traction control while MDX has. ??? Is that right? I remember seeing traction control is also standard on pilot.
__________________
<a href="http://www.xshade.com/"><img src="http://i23.photobucket.com/albums/b369/timchen/xshadelogo50.jpg"></a> Your next Generation Autobomile Windshield Sunshade 2003 Starlight Silver LX + oem roof rack ($240 cross bars included) + Manik side steps ($215) + tinted windows (DIY $30) + oem alarm ($275) + rear splash guard + cargo tray + light weight 300zx 16" wheelz + microwave reverse sensor ($215) + Weathertech weatherflector ($44) + Tow Hitch ($115) just convert to MOBIL 1 0w-20; Michelin CT since (27500miles) 1993 Nissan 300ZX NA stg7+ pearl white 2000 Jaguar S-type 3.0 Black |
|
|
|
|
|
#11 (permalink) |
|
Super Senior Member
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: san jose,
Posts: 747
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
|
MDX is 48/50,000 while Pilot is 36/36,000
17" rim vs 16"
__________________
<a href="http://www.xshade.com/"><img src="http://i23.photobucket.com/albums/b369/timchen/xshadelogo50.jpg"></a> Your next Generation Autobomile Windshield Sunshade 2003 Starlight Silver LX + oem roof rack ($240 cross bars included) + Manik side steps ($215) + tinted windows (DIY $30) + oem alarm ($275) + rear splash guard + cargo tray + light weight 300zx 16" wheelz + microwave reverse sensor ($215) + Weathertech weatherflector ($44) + Tow Hitch ($115) just convert to MOBIL 1 0w-20; Michelin CT since (27500miles) 1993 Nissan 300ZX NA stg7+ pearl white 2000 Jaguar S-type 3.0 Black |
|
|
|
|
|
#12 (permalink) | |
|
Super Senior Member
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Tampa Bay Area Florida
Posts: 2,479
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
|
Quote:
I'd try again first though because there might have just been a quirk in the system when you tried.
__________________
Note: If you want to be sure I see a post either quote a message from me or put - florida_guy - somewhere in the body of the post so it shows up when I search. I am trying to stay active without spending too much time here. '03 Pilot EX Sandstone Metallic Options: Cargo Cover OEM Hitch StreetPilot 2610 Sportsworks Transport Bike Carrier |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#13 (permalink) | |
|
Super Senior Member
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Orange Park, FL
Posts: 1,488
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
|
Quote:
Acura's also have roadside assistance standard.
__________________
2001 CR-V EX Automatic - Clover Green Pearl - Westin Safari Bar; OEM skidplate, fog lights, roof rack, cargo mat, & passenger arm rest; Benevento Bug shield;225/70/15 Geolandar HT's 2006 Pilot EX 4WD - Steel Blue - OEM Auto Day/Night mirror, retractable cargo cover, backup sensors, mud guards, and cargo tray. Full set of Pilotpads from Wong. 2010 Camaro 1SS RS, LS3, 6sp Manual, Sunroof, B.A. Audio |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#15 (permalink) | |
|
Senior Member
![]() ![]() ![]() Join Date: May 2002
Location: Clarendon Hills
Posts: 176
Feedback Score: 0 reviews
|
...and I'm pretty sure that cork wouldn't really do anything for the Pilot's power -- though it might be a usefull to filter out more noise!
![]() Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
| Sponsored Links | |
Advertisement | |
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Rate This Thread | |
|
|